1) My areas where my carbon footprint is the largest is in the ‘Secondary’ calculator which is a collective total of food preferences, fashion choices, packaging, furniture and electronics, recycling recreation, car manufacture, finance and other services. My personal footprint for this section was 1.60 metric tons of CO2 where my overall personal footprint is 1.87 metric tons. That means that my secondary contributors account for 86% of my carbon footprint. I learned that purchasing foods closer to home and seasonally grown foods are a key contributor to my carbon footprint which surprised me.
2) In many cases, a lot of the activities we carry out in our lives can be significantly regulated simply by being more aware of other options. Since I live on campus, I don’t need a car and rarely use the transit systems unless it’s for an outing of some kind. People can organize themselves to be more efficient even when it comes to travelling. There are other options people can use to reduce transit carbon footprints such as hybrid vehicles or electric. Overall, it’s important to understand that we don’t need a lot of things and that is definitely the main contributor to our carbon footprint in general, the fact that we are a society of leisure and convenience. We have a choice to eat local, walk/bike to work or school, save energy by using less power, buy products that have less packaging, recycle everything we use as well as many other factors.
3) My footprint in comparison to Canada’s average is significantly lower but that is strictly because of my situation of living. I’m living on residence with no need to move around. I admit that if I were at home (my house in the Okanagan) I would have a higher carbon footprint. But even looking at the global goal’s footprint, it’s hard to realistically imagine a world that can live up to that. I believe that it’s not feasible first of all because of infrastructure and population density. We need to be mobile to live and to be mobile, we use energy. The global target is lower than my footprint, which is pretty significant judging by the fact that I don’t have a car or anything that contributes majorly to the carbon footprint. If the world wants to fulfill its millennium goal for a low carbon footprint, people will have to re-establish their values and ultimately their entire ways of living. It’s not possible in the near future, in North America anyways. As for actions that would reduce my individual footprint, I’m interested in completely avoiding packaging as well as moving towards buying locally grown and organic foods since the alternatives otherwise increase the carbon footprint significantly.
4) Some of the challenges are simply due to the fact that we can’t avoid certain things that contribute to our carbon footprint such as plastic packaging or heating our homes and using electricity. If the action for reduction is to stop using a CO2 emitting vehicle, the initial costs are high and some people can’t afford it but it will pay off in the long run. For example, if one were to purchase a green energy vehicle, there would be no emissions but the cost to buy a green energy car is very expensive. Also, a lot of green initiatives that are being used today are simply inconvenient. Recycling is a process that takes labour and effort. In our society, we are not enabled or educated on ways we can recycle all of our waste because of the fact that we are so used to a different system. The key point is that infrastructure needs to change and to do that, there needs to be a pivot in political will as well as societal will.
5) Some ways to address these challenges would be to educate others on the issue and provide a means of solving the problem that works. The problem is inspiring enough people to make it happen. Once something is rolling, it’s easy to establish infrastructure because if the people want it, the government will look into it. Ultimately, people need to address their own lives. Collaboratively, everyone who alters themselves a little bit by doing little things that are more ecologically friendly, the trends will catch on. A collective action that a small community could make would be to establish programs that house sustainability initiatives and start the process of building a system that can become reliable and convenient. One example of this could be setting up a recycling program that one hundred percent recycles all waste. To have a program like this, you need waste that can be recycled and that’s a whole different action in general but it all ties together. On a global scale this would be ideal because it would greatly reduce waste, even cutting it out completely. This would have major benefits to the health of our global ecosystems as well as our own. It would also reduce GHG emissions because it would cut down the amount of energy we would need to process and treat our waste.
6) In my opinion, the carbon-footprint calculator is effective in analyzing ecological change but is hard to assess the effects of it on behaviour. The process of becoming an activist for change is not an easy one. To assess one’s carbon footprint is very useful to getting a head start on what can be reduced and improved in individual lives but overall change relies on motivation. If someone doesn’t see a point to changing, why would they?
Peer Feedback (Prior to final copy)
· “Good clarification/examination of WHAT contributed to your main carbon footprint factor.”
· “Focus on awareness and thoughts of increasing awareness leading to change were great, and totally spot-on (in my opinion). There was a lot of great thoughtful insight in your reflection, evident that you explored WHAT the main carbon contributors were. All points in criteria were addressed well. Great job!”
· “Submission meets word criteria. The carbon footprint calculator was used and ideas were separated into sections but flowed smoothly.”
· “Possible solutions to reducing carbon footprint are identified and suggestions of how others can carry out lifestyle changes are also discussed.”
· “The problems/difficulties with carrying out this planned action (individual and collective) are also discussed.”
· “Impressively low carbon footprint. No suggestions. Good stuff!”
· “In section 3, clarify where is ‘home’. Also I feel like you should expand on the fact you think the ideal GHG target is unfeasible.”
· “You provide some great insight on behavioural and infrastructural change, but I’m not sure you directly address the one action you are going to take, and one action you would like at the collective level, nor how this affects global health. Since these are key objectives for the assignment…”
· “1st paragraph is great, very clear.”
· “Maybe you can concentrate on your food choices? Or, you mention education, so maybe leverage that discussion point?”
· “You have it at 717 words.”
No comments:
Post a Comment